side1.gif (1480 bytes)

text.jpg (15986 bytes)
Home | About Us | Address Newsletter | Seminars | Links | Foreign Policy |Article |Select lang.

side2.gif (1534 bytes)

         

Recent Event

Table of contents :

Back to Recent Event   

26
April
2008
1- No clash has taken place with US vessel in Persian Gulf, Iran Navy
2- Afghan leader criticizes US on conduct of war
3- UN urges stepped up efforts to keep WMD from terrorists
4- Russia warns Georgia over Caucasus
5- Energy crisis forces India to join Iran gas pipeline project
     

No clash has taken place with US vessel in Persian Gulf, Iran Navy
 April 26, 2008

 The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Navy official has said that no clash has taken place between Iranian boat and a US vessel in the Persian Gulf waters terming it as totally baseless.
 Speaking to IRNA, the official said unlike what has been reported, no US vessel has opened fire at any Iranian boat in the Persian Gulf waters.
 Western media reported on Friday that a cargo ship hired by the US military opened fire at a boat that may be Iranian.
 "Foreign forces are completely aware of our policy in the Persian Gulf region and know very well that any confrontation would face crushing response from Iranian courageous forces," he said.
 "If there such a confrontation takes place in the Persian Gulf waters, then no shooting vessel could survive to report what happened," he added.
 He reiterated the strength and complete readiness of Iranian Navy to control any movement of foreign ships in the Persian Gulf waters and the Straight of Hormuz.
 The official said that releasing such "suspicious reports would only be a source of concern for the vessels currently moving through the waterway in full peace of mind and this is completely against Iran's strategy to preserve security in the region." Reiterating Tehran's policy to maintain stability in the Persian Gulf region, he said, "Iran believes that any disorder in the region would have undesired consequences."
He added that releasing those baseless reports were "the result of the US officials' irresponsible and unprofessional policies in the region which could create an unsafe atmosphere for non-military vessels moving through the waterway."
He said that Iranian armed forces are well-prepared to confront any threat in the region and the military experts were investigating the report.
IRNA
Top

=======================================
Afghan leader criticizes US on conduct of war
 April 26, 2008

 President Hamid Karzai strongly criticized the British and American conduct of the war, insisting that his government be given the lead in policy decisions.
 President Hamid Karzai says the American-led coalition in Afghanistan needs to do more to respect Afghans' independence.
 Karzai said that he wanted American forces to stop arresting suspected Taliban and their sympathizers, and that the continued threat of arrest and past mistreatment were discouraging Taliban from coming forward to lay down their arms.
 He criticized the American-led coalition as prosecuting the war on terrorism in Afghan villages, saying the real terrorist threat lay in sanctuaries of the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Pakistan.
 The president said that civilian casualties, which have dropped substantially since last year, needed to cease completely.
 For nearly two years the American-led coalition has refused to recognize the need to create a trained police force, he said, leading to a critical lack of law and order.
 He called instead for greater respect of Afghanistan's fierce independence, and for more attention to be paid to building up the country, than doing things for it.
 He admitted that "lots of things" in the last six years could have been handled better and singled out policies led by the United States, namely tackling terrorism and handling the Taliban, both as prisoners and on the battlefield.
 On terrorism, he repeated a call he has made for several years, that sanctuaries across the border in Pakistan be closed off.
 "There is no way but to close the sanctuaries," he said.
 "Pakistan will have no peace, Pakistan's progress will suffer, so will Afghanistan's peace and progress, so will the world's. If you want to live, and live in peace, and work for prosperity, that has to happen. The sanctuaries must go, period."
The deaths of civilians in the fighting have also been a big problem, he said.
 "It seriously undermines our efforts to have an effective campaign against terrorism," he said.
 "I am not happy with civilian casualties coming down; I want an end to civilian casualties," he said.
 "As much as one may argue it's difficult, I don't accept that argument." He added, "Because the war against terrorism is not in Afghan villages, the war against terrorism is elsewhere, and that's where the war should go," referring to the Taliban and Qaeda sanctuaries in Pakistan.
 IRNA
Top

=======================================
UN urges stepped up efforts to keep WMD from terrorists
 April 26, 2008

 The UN Security Council unanimously approved a resolution Friday urging stepped up efforts to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of terrorists and black marketeers.
 It calls on all states to fully implement a council resolution adopted in April 2004 requiring all 192 UN member states to adopt laws to prevent non-state actors from acquiring nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.
 It notes that some countries - which were not named - haven't filed a report on their efforts that was due in October 2004.
 The new resolution stresses the need to enhance coordination of national, regional and international efforts to strengthen a global response to this serious challenge and threat to international security.
 The April 2004 resolution was adopted to close a loophole in global efforts to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
 While international treaties targeted weapons proliferation by governments, until Resolution 1540 was adopted in 2004 there was no legal instrument to prevent terrorists, crooked scientists, black marketeers and other non-state actors from obtaining such weapons.
 Resolution 1540 requires all countries to adopt laws to prevent non-state actors from manufacturing, acquiring or trafficking in nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, the materials to make them, and the missiles and other systems to deliver them.
 It requires all countries to take measures to account for, and secure these weapons as well as missiles and weapons material. It also demands that countries develop border controls and step up law enforcement efforts to detect, deter, prevent and combat the illicit trafficking and brokering in such items.
 All countries were required to submit a report within six months to a Security Council committee monitoring implementation of the resolution.
 The resolution adopted Friday extends the committee's mandate until April 25, 2011 and again calls upon all states that have not yet presented a first report on steps they have taken or intent to take to implement Resolution 1540 to submit such a report to the 1540 committee without delay.
 It emphasizes the importance for all states to implement fully that resolution.
 It also calls on the committee to continue to intensify its efforts to promote the full implementation by all states> by reaching out to countries, facilitating technical assistance, and promoting the sharing of experience and lessons learned.
 The council noted that not all states have presented to the 1540 committee their national reports on implementation and that the full implementation of Resolution 1540 by all states, including the adoption of national laws and measures to ensure implementation of these laws, is a long-term task that will require continuous efforts at national, regional and international levels.
 Resolution 1540 was introduced as the International Atomic Energy Agency was investigating a vast underworld market in nuclear equipment and know-how, spurred by Pakistan's admission in February 2004 that its leading nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan, passed technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea.
 The new resolution was approved on the day that IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei angrily criticized Israel for bombing an alleged Syrian nuclear facility, chastised the U.S. for withholding information on the site, and said the agency will look into the allegations.
IRNA
Top

 ==================================
Russia warns Georgia over Caucasus
 April 26, 2008

 Russia is ready to use "military means" to protect its residents if war breaks out in the Georgian separatist provinces of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, a foreign ministry official said.
 Valery Kenyaikin was also critical of the US role in helping to resolve the conflict, which threatens to destabilise the entire strategic South Caucasus region.
 Kenyaikin said: "If a military conflict develops, then we will have to react, including with military means. We are ready to defend our citizens."
 Georgia accuses Russia of trying to annex the territory by supporting separatist forces and encouraging residents to take up Russian citizenship. Most people in Abkhazia and South Ossetia have Russian passports.
Kenyaikin's comments were Moscow's sharpest warning so far to Georgia in its standoff with the two breakaway regions.
 He said: "We don't plan anything of a military character, but should military conflicts break out on one side or another, then the initiator of these conflicts should be assured that Russia will take all possible measures to defend the interests of its countrymen and its citizens."
 Kenyaikin also alleged that Georgia was massing military forces along the administrative border that separates it from Abkhazia.
 The build-up "can only mean preparations for military action ... possibly in the near future. This can't be ruled out," he said.
 'No confidence'
 Kenyaikin is in charge of relations with former Soviet states, and said he has "no confidence" that Washington is working in any way to resolve the standoff.
 Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, initiated closer ties with both provinces, prompting international condemnation and outrage in Tbilisi.
 According to Georgy Baramidze, Georgia's deputy prime minister, Russia has "crossed the line" and committed "a dangerous and provocative act" which could "destabilise the whole region".
 Another flare-up occurred on April 20 when an unmanned Georgian spy plane was shot down. Georgia blames Russia, which says that Abkhaz rebels were responsible.
 Georgia's pro-Western government is trying to join Nato, but the unresolved conflicts in the two northern provinces are part of the reason that the alliance has decided to delay putting the ex-Soviet republic on the path to membership.
 Georgia says Russia is artificially stirring up the conflicts to weaken its independence, but Moscow accuses the Georgians of being the aggressors.
 Agencies
Top

========================================
Energy crisis forces India to join Iran gas pipeline project
 April 26, 2008

 ISLAMABAD, April 25: Differences between Pakistan and India over the Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) gas pipeline project were resolved on Friday and the two countries agreed to start work on laying pipelines next year for procuring gas from Iran by December 2012.
 Talks between the two countries to resolve the differences, mainly relating to transit fee and transportation tariff, failed in June last year, putting the $7.5 billion ?peace pipeline? project into cold storage. But the current energy crisis and spiralling oil prices brought them back to the table.
 India showed urgency in resuming talks after the Chinese government expressed interest in joining the project, virtually replacing India. India did not take part in three rounds of talks held over the past nine months and its oil minister cancelled at the last minute a scheduled visit to Islamabad in February.
 Petroleum Minister Khwaja Mohammad Asif, addressing a joint press conference with his Indian counterpart Murli Deora, said that contentious issues had been resolved, but an agreement would be signed after a go-ahead from the two governments. The process would not take more than ?a few days or a few weeks?. He said Pakistan?s share in the cost of the project would be around $3 billion.
 The two projects will enable Pakistan to meet about 75 per cent of its gas requirement.
 Work on the approximately 2,775km IPI pipeline will begin in 2009 and will be completed by December 2012. It will carry 2.46 billion cubic feet of gas a day from Iran?s South Pars field to be equally shared by Pakistan and India.
 We have reached an agreement on the principles on which we hope the project can go ahead. India believes that close economic cooperation with its neighbours is not only a necessity but it also builds the stakes and trust that strengthen the overall relationship,? said the Indian minister.
 The two sides agreed to resolve all issues before the next round of talks scheduled later this year.
 Mr Deora said the issue of transit fee would be resolved in two weeks. He said India considered the transit fee demanded by Pakistan to be high.
 Earlier, India was demanding that Pakistan should waive the transit fee because it would also be getting transportation charges.
 Both the ministers dismissed reports about US reservations over the project because it involved Iran.
 Answering a question, he said that unrest in Balochistan was almost under control. ?There will be no threat to this pipeline.?
 The route of the pipeline has been altered at the insistence of India for security reasons. It will enter Pakistan near Gwadar and move along the highway to join the transmission system near Nawabshah.
 Indian officials told the PTI news agency that the two sides had agreed on a ?template? for finalising the transportation tariff, which was linked to the cost of constructing the pipeline.
 The fee would be worked out when Pakistan finalised a contract for building its section of the pipeline, they said.
 They said the two sides had narrowed their differences on the transit fee and agreed on a broad formula for calculating it. There were indications that the eventual figure would be a compromise between India?s earlier offer of 15 cents for one million British thermal units of gas and Pakistan?s demand of about 60 cents.
 Petroleum Secretary Farukh Qayyum said the transit fee was a ?very minor component? of the cost of the project and the two sides had ?agreed on a range that is mutually acceptable? and based on international practices.
 A joint statement issued after the meeting said the two sides had also discussed the structure of the company that would execute and manage the project.
 Agencies add: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is visiting Pakistan and India next week and the main issue expected to feature in his talks in Islamabad and New Delhi is the pipeline.
 dawn
Top