side1.gif (1480 bytes)

text.jpg (15986 bytes)
Home | About Us | Address Newsletter | Seminars | Links | Foreign Policy |Article |Select lang.

side2.gif (1534 bytes)

         

Recent Event

Table of contents :

Back to Recent Event   

30
April
2008
1- Armenian PM welcomes Turkish dialogue request
2- Press freedom has declined worldwide: researchers
3- Gas pipeline to provide money, jobs, energy: Afghan minister
4- Greece, Russia sign accord on gas pipeline
5- NATO allies put pressure on Russia
6- Bush says Syria nuclear disclosure intended to prod North Korea and Iran
7- Iran's president visits India for gas pipeline talks
  8- Iran president says peace proposal to Russia is 'comprehensive'
     
     

Armenian PM welcomes Turkish dialogue request
April 30, 2008

 YEREVAN - Armenia is ready to start dialogue with Turkey on improving relations if Ankara does not set preconditions to talks, Armenia's new prime minister said Sunday.
The two neighbors have no diplomatic links after Ankara severed ties in protest against Armenian occupation of the Nagorno-Karabakh region, over which Armenia fought Turkey's ally Azerbaijan in a war in the early 1990s.
 "I confirm the readiness of the government of Armenia to engage in constructive dialogue and establish relations without preconditions," the press office of the Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sarksyan said he wrote in a letter to Turkey.
 An Armenian-backed administration controls the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Armenia and Azerbaijan are still officially at war over the mountainous area.
 Last week Turkey's foreign minister said he had sent a letter to Armenia calling for dialogue. Armenia is a mainly Christian state of around three million on the edge of the Caucasus which hosts a pipeline pumping oil to Europe from Asia.
 Armenia also accuses Turkey of genocide during the violence at the end of World War I. Turkey denies the accusations and says that both Christian Armenians and Muslim Turks died in the fighting.
 "I assure you that our efforts will be aimed at ensuring peace, tolerance and stability in our region," Sarksyan told Turkey in the letter.
 Sarksyan took over as prime minister earlier this month. He had previously been central bank chief.
Turkishpress
Top

====================================
Press freedom has declined worldwide: researchers
April 30, 2008

 WASHINGTON, April 29: Worldwide, the environment for journalists grew more hostile last year, extending a six-year downturn, US researchers reported on Tuesday.
 Setbacks for press freedom outnumbered advances 2-to-1 across the globe, although the Internet and blogs helped slow the decline, particularly in Iran, reported the Freedom House, a non-profit organisation that released the report in advance of the World Press Freedom Day on Saturday.
 ôThere have been repeated crackdowns in the past few years and Iran is on the cusp of the bottom-performing category, but kept out by these forms of expression,¤ said Karlin Karlekar, senior researcher for the Freedom House.
 Iraq, meanwhile, again was a disappointment. ôThere hasnút been the improvement in Iraq one hoped for several years ago,¤ the researcher said. ôOne of the reasons given for the invasion was to bring democracy to Iraq. The democracy that has been established is highly problematic.¤
 Still, the US-backed country was not listed among the worst countries for press freedom. The worst-rated country was North Korea, while Burma was second with a worsening crackdown in the media. Cuba, Libya, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Belarus, Zimbabwe and Equatorial Guinea were also among the worst-rated.
 Since media played a key role covering coups and contested elections in such countries as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Georgia, journalists became prime targets of government crackdowns, according to the report.
 ôFor every step forward in press freedom last year there were two steps back,¤ said Jennifer Windsor, executive director of Freedom House, in a statement accompanying the report. ôWhen press freedom is in retreat it is an ominous sign that restrictions on other freedoms may soon follow.¤
 And yet, journalists were credited with pushing the boundaries set by authorities. In Egypt, for instance, their increased willingness to cross ôred lines¤ was cited as boosting the country into the partly free category from the not-free group.Violence against journalists was cited in a wide range of countries, including Mexico, Russia and the Philippines.
 Abuse of libel laws increased in a number of countries, particularly Africa.
 The region of the former Soviet Union, including Russia, recorded the largest region-wide setback, including declines in press freedom in Georgia, Kyrgyzstan and several Central European countries.
 Western Europe again had the highest level of press freedom in the world, although declines were registered in Portugal, Malta and Turkey.
 Of 195 countries and territories rated, 72 were cited as free, 59 as partly free and 64 as not free.
AP
Top

========================================
Gas pipeline to provide money, jobs, energy: Afghan minister
April 30, 2008

 KABUL  - A planned gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to India will provide hundreds of millions of dollars in fees, as well as jobs, for Afghanistan and give the country much-needed power, Kabul's mining minister said.
 The multi-million-dollar scheme, which was planned years ago and also includes Pakistan, was given fresh impetus at a meeting in Islamabad last week where the nations agreed basic terms, Mohammad Ibrahim Adel told reporters.
 The agreement is expected to be finalised at a meeting in India later this year, he said.
 India officially agreed to join the project during the meeting in Islamabad and promised to buy 50 percent of the gas from Turkmenistan, he said.
 The gathering also worked out how the gas would be distributed and fixed prices, including for transit fees, the minister said.
 The pipeline would bring cash-strapped Afghanistan "hundreds of millions of dollars" in transit fees and provide jobs for more than 1,000 people, Adel said.
 If finalised, the seven-billion-dollar project, which will carry 33 billion cubic metres of gas every year from Turkmenistan to Afghanistan, Pakistan and India, would start construction in late 2009 and finish five years later.
 For the first two years, Afghanistan would buy up to two billion cubic metres annually for power production, later boosting this to five billion.
 A lack of power is among a host of problems, not least an insurgency, holding back development in post-Taliban Afghanistan.
 AFP
Top

=======================================
Greece, Russia sign accord on gas pipeline
April 30, 2008

 MOSCOW, April 29: Greece and Russia on Tuesday signed a deal to extend the proposed Russian-Italian South Stream gas pipeline into Greek territory, boosting Moscowús presence on Europeús energy supply routes.
 Russian Minister for Industry and Energy Viktor Khristenko and Greek Development Minister Christos Folias signed the deal at a televised ceremony in the Kremlin. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who held talks with Greek Prime Minister Costas Caramanlis before the ceremony, said both South Stream and a proposed Russian-backed oil pipeline through Greece were in Europeús interest.
 Their aim is to significantly increase the energy security not only of the Balkans but of the entire European continent,¤ he said.
 The 280-kilometre Burgas-Alexandroupolis oil pipeline will connect the Black Sea to the Aegean as a vital alternative route bypassing the tanker-congested Bosphorus Straits.
 South Stream, meanwhile, is planned to pump up to 30 billion cubic metres per year gas under Black Sea from Russia to Bulgaria before crossing southern Europe in two branches, one northwest to Austria, the other southwest to Greece and Italy. Developed by Gazprom with Italyús Eni, the project is seen as crucial to Russiaús efforts to maintain a dominant position on the European continentús gas supply.
AFP
Top

===================================
NATO allies put pressure on Russia
April 30, 2008

 What do you do when confronted by a bully? The first lesson you learn as a child in the school yard is that reasoning and turning the other cheek unfortunately does not work very well, and will only get you a reputation as an easy victim. On the other hand, knocking someone's teeth out because of a mean taunt is not the way to go either. Producing an immediate, proportionate response is a skill you have to learn.
 In the schoolyard of international politics, much the same rules apply. Some countries tend to behave like bullies. The more other nations try to accommodate them in the cause of getting along, the more they will bully. The Soviet Union — and Russia today had long history of subtle and not-so-subtle aggression towards its much smaller neighbors — "the garden of the red czars" was one of the names for the Soviet empire and its "near abroad."
 Unfortunately for the Russian leadership, many of those smaller neighbors are acquiring new, powerful friends and therefore a measure of protection. Bullies never like this. Three small former Soviet republics, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, are now members of NATO, allies of the United States, Canada and almost all of Europe. Other former Soviet republics are applying to follow their lead, hoping to escape Russian dominance.
 At the NATO summit in Bucharest in early April, the United States pressed for giving Georgia and Ukraine Membership Action Plans (MAPs) with a view to future NATO membership. Such plans were granted to Albania, Macedonia and Croatia, who have also been knocking on NATO's door. Unfortunately, Russian lobbying — maybe threats would be a better word — stopped the Europeans from endorsing MAPs for Georgia and Ukraine. The NATO summit communique promised action in the short-term future, but that was as far as it went. Russian bullying worked on this occasion.
 But that's not the end of the story. Russia has also managed to entangle the future of Georgia with the status of Kosovo, the small Balkan nation that in February declared independence from Russia's ally Serbia. If the international community recognized Kosovo's declaration of independence, so the Russian government fumed, Moscow would go ahead and recognize the independence of Russian minority enclaves in former Soviet republics, such as Abkhazia and South Ossetia. These are part of Georgia and have been beset by Russian "peacekeeping" troops since the civil wars that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union. The post-Soviet space is littered with unresolved conflicts of this kind.
 In the case of Kosovo's independence, Europe and the United States had enough at stake not to allow the Russian threats to stop their recognition of Kosovo. Almost a decade of involvement in the Balkans with no end in sight prompted the international community to support Kosovo, in the hope that some momentum for reconstruction and economic development could be gained and eventually allow international peacekeepers to come home. In the case of the United States, we still have 7,000 troops stationed in Kosovo on an ongoing basis.
 Last week, Russia made its move — which was actually not as bad as might have been expected. It announced the opening of Russian consulates in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and offered to issue passports to any ethnic Russian who desired it and who would then be able to travel visa free across the border. (At least the Russian response was mainly of a diplomatic nature; President Vladimir Putin at one point even threatened Ukraine with nuclear war, if Ukraine persisted in seeking NATO membership.) More menacingly, Russia shot down a Georgian unmanned aerial vehicle on April 20.
 Russia's maneuvers deserve a clear and firm response, first of all on principle. The United States and Europe need to point out to the Russian government that the situations in Kosovo and in the Georgian minority enclaves are by no means parallel. Georgia has at no time tried to ethnically cleanse and mass murder its Russian minorities, as Serbia tried to do with its Albanian population in Kosovo. This action was stopped by NATO in 1999, and it lost Serbia every moral right to govern the Kosovars.
 Second, NATO needs to revisit the question of MAPs for Georgia and Ukraine as soon as possible, in order to reverse the decision taken in Bucharest. Bending to Russian pressure was wrong in the first place, and push-back in just such a measured and responsible form is certainly justified. Who knows, it might even teach the Russian bullies a lesson.
 washingtontimes
Top

========================================
Bush says Syria nuclear disclosure intended to prod North Korea and Iran
April 30, 2008

 WASHINGTON: President George W. Bush said Tuesday that last week's disclosure of what senior American officials called evidence of a nearly completed nuclear reactor in Syria was intended to warn North Korea and Iran about the dangers of spreading nuclear weapons.
 Bush also defended his administration's decision to keep that evidence secret for more than seven months after Israeli bombers destroyed the Syrian building on Sept. 6.
 The International Atomic Energy Agency last week criticized the United States for withholding information about the site and Israel for destroying it, saying both actions undermined efforts to verify whether it was a nuclear reactor being built with the assistance of North Korea.
 Making the first remarks in public about the Israeli attack by any American official, Bush said that his administration maintained a cloak of secrecy to avoid the risk of further military conflict in the region, including possible Syrian retaliation against Israel. He said that risk of conflict "was reduced" now.
 Bush did not explain why exactly the administration disclosed the information at this point, but the timing coincided with renewed efforts to persuade North Korea to abide by last year's agreement to acknowledge all of its nuclear activities. The North Korean activities include what administration officials assert are a still undisclosed program to enrich uranium and the sale of nuclear technology to countries like Syria.
 "We also wanted to advance certain policy objectives through the disclosures, and one would be to the North Koreans to make it abundantly clear that we, we may know more about you than you think," Bush said at a White House news conference.
 Senior officials have signaled that the administration may accept a less-than-full disclosure, allowing North Korea, for example, not to explain its nuclear cooperation with Syria in the kind of detail that American officials have now done.
 In his remarks on Tuesday and at Camp David on April 19, the president appeared to back off such a compromise. He restated his demand that North Korea make "a complete disclosure" about its proliferation and enrichment activities.
 Senior officials showed videos and photograph last week documenting what they said was evidence of North Korean aid in the design and construction of a plutonium reactor in eastern Syria.
 The officials offered the most extensive information about the Israeli military operation, revealing that Israeli bombs had badly damaged the building, but that the Syrians worked feverishly for more than a month to dismantle the ruins to conceal evidence of nuclear activity. Israeli officials have never discussed the strike publicly.
 Even as senior officials were making their case, a State Department delegation held a new round of talks with the North Koreans last week, but the talks failed to make progress in getting a declaration, which is now four months overdue.
 Bush said that the disclosure of a covert Syrian reactor, which Syria has denied, should persuade other countries to support United Nations Security Council resolutions intended to keep Iran and other countries from developing nuclear arms.
 "We have an interest in sending a message to Iran and the world for that matter about just how destabilizing a nuclear proliferation would be in the Middle East," he said.
 Bush also criticized the militant Islamic group Hamas as an obstacle to peace between Israelis and Palestinians, but he passed up a chance to criticize former President Jimmy Carter, as his aides have, for meeting with Hamas leaders last week.
 "Foreign policy and peace is undermined by Hamas in the Middle East," he said when asked whether Carter's meetings had undercut his efforts. "They're the ones who are undermining peace. They're the ones whose foreign policy objective is the destruction of Israel. They're the ones who are trying to create enough violence to stop the advance of the two-party state solution."
 Asked about the political crisis in Zimbabwe, Bush sharply criticized President Robert Mugabe, saying he had "failed the country."
 He also made it clear that he was disappointed with other countries in the region for not doing more to support the opposition in Zimbabwe. That was an indirect but clear reference to South Africa, whose president, Thabo Mbeki, has called the dispute over last month's elections an internal matter.
 "It's really incumbent upon the nations in the neighborhood to step up and lead," Bush said, "and recognize that the will of the people must be respected and recognize that that will come about because they're tired of failed leadership."
 worldnews
Top

=======================================
Iran's president visits India for gas pipeline talks
April 30, 2008

 NEW DELHI - A $7 billion gas pipeline that would link Iran and India topped the agenda Tuesday as the Islamic republic's president made his first visit to New Delhi, despite strong U.S. objections to the project.
 The trip came as India and the United States are struggling to finalize a landmark nuclear energy deal.
 But New Delhi has made it clear that it will look to any source to feed its energy hungry economy, and India saw the brief visit by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a chance kick-start the long-stalled pipeline project.
 Ahmadinejad arrived in the evening and met Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Pratibha Patil during his five hours in New Delhi, India's foreign ministry said. His visit was the first by an Iranian leader in five years.
 The pipeline needs to run through Pakistan, India's longtime rival. But disagreements between the two over costs, and Indian fears about the pipeline's security have held up the project.
 However, the South Asian countries are reportedly close to striking a deal on how much New Delhi should pay Islamabad for the fuel shipped through Pakistani territory.
 That would put the project back on track , a prospect that clearly dismays Washington, which has repeatedly pressed India to back its efforts to end Iran's nuclear program.
 The United States last week said India should press Ahmadinejad to end Iran's atomic program and its alleged aid to Iraqi militants. Washington also said India should tell Ahmadinejad to stop supporting Islamic militant groups in the Middle East, such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
 India responded by saying it would decide what , if anything , to discuss with Ahmadinejad, tartly telling Washington that it did not need "any guidance on the future conduct" of its foreign affairs.
 On Tuesday, Indian Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon told reporters that India believes engaging with Iran is far more productive than isolating the Islamic republic.
 "From our point of view, the more engagement there is, the more Iran becomes a factor of stability in the region," he said after meeting Ahmadinejad.
 Apart from the pipeline, the two sides agreed to try to triple trade from $10 billion a year but did not set a timeframe. They also discussed the situation in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East.
 India's desire to build on its long-standing ties to Iran highlight New Delhi's eagerness to avoid taking sides in international disputes and work with as many countries as possible , even if its partners disdain each other.
 Its willingness to seek energy supplies from both Tehran and Washington is one example of New Delhi's desire to play the middle. Another is its developing relationship with Iran's archenemy Israel. Earlier this year India launched an Israeli spy satellite, which is in part intended to monitor Iran's nuclear program.
 Menon said Ahmadinejad did not bring up the satellite during his time in New Delhi.
 The Associated Press
Top

=====================================
Iran president says peace proposal to Russia is 'comprehensive'
April 30, 2008

 NEW DELHI (AFP) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that a "comprehensive" package offered to Russia was aimed at "eradicating" the threats of war.
 The comments follow statements by Tehran's top national security official that he had held talks with his Russian counterpart on a new Iranian proposals to solve world problems, including the nuclear standoff with the West.
 Ahmadinejad, after meeting Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, said the "comprehensive" package was based on mutual friendship.
 "We have offered a proposal for comprehensive cooperation and constructive dialogue based on friendship and sustainable security to eradicate threats of war," Ahmadinejad told reporters.
 "Its a valued issue we have proposed to discuss with them," the Iranian leader said, without giving further details of the proposals, which appear to be a wide friendship treaty rather than a specific offer to end the nuclear crisis.
 On Monday Iran's top national security official Saeed Jalili said after talks with Russia's Valentin Sobolev that Tehran planned to have a "good basis for negotiations" with the West.
 The package also appears to emphasise what Iran sees as its growing power in the world and the supposed decline of Britain and the United States.
 "The world is no longer unilateral," Jalili told a news conference alongside Sobolev, the acting head of Russia's security council.
 It would be a major surprise if the package contained any concession from Iran to break the deadlock in the nuclear standoff as Ahmadinejad has repeatedly said Tehran will not budge.
 The West fears Iran wants to use nuclear technology to make an atomic weapon but Ahmadinejad in New Delhi insisted that developed nations planned to monopolise nuclear energy to meet their needs.
 "They (the West) want to deny the world cheap nuclear energy and they are bringing political pressure on countries to discourage them from their nuclear energy programmes," Ahmadinejad said.
 "The ruling parties of the world (West) want all the good things exclusively for themselves and their stand that we are building nuclear weapons is a lie," he said through an interpreter.
 Russia is building Iran's first nuclear power station in the southern city of Bushehr, a much delayed project due to come online in 2008. It is also contracted to supply nuclear fuel for the facility.
 With robust political and economic ties with Tehran, Moscow has played a key role in the nuclear standoff.
 It has repeatedly urged the West to solve the crisis through diplomacy but as a veto-wielding UN Security Council permanent member it has also backed three resolutions imposing sanctions against Tehran.
 Moscow has also told Tehran it currently has no need to enrich uranium on its own soil and should obey the resolutions' calls to stop the process, which can be used to make nuclear weapons.
 India, which carried out nuclear weapons tests in 1998, is bound to Russia with a 20-year friendship treaty
 AFP
Top